Tomas Castile

Valuation

Values are model estimates on an uncalibrated scale. They are not predictions of a transfer fee and have not been validated against observed fees. Model 0.3.0-uncalibrated.

Performance profile

Well-rounded midfielder without a standout axis in this data — no category clears the 46th percentile among positional peers. Availability is the headline risk: 26% of available minutes played.

Season

Key strengths

• No standout axis in this dataNothing clears the 80th percentile among positional peers on the metrics we carry.

Key risks and limitations

• Goal threat is a clear weakness7th percentile among MIDs in this division
• Chance creation is a clear weakness6th percentile among MIDs in this division
• Availability is the headline risk26% of available minutes; 14 matchweeks missed
• Small sample566 minutes across 10 appearances. Percentiles are published but thinly evidenced.

Valuation history

Comparable players

Comparable transfers

Not available. The feed carries no observed transfer fees and no contract expiry dates, so there is nothing to build a comparable-fee distribution from.

This section is left in rather than removed, because its absence is itself a finding: any fee inference in this report would be unsupported.

Data confidence

Model confidence

46%of 72% ceiling

Sample

566 min · 10 apps

Last fixture

9 Jan

Percentiles are taken against MIDs in the Demo Premier League with 270 or more minutes. The model holds no contract, injury, wage or transfer data, and no progressive passing, carrying or pressing metrics.

Methodology

Weekly output is weighted by position, discounted by minutes as a credibility multiplier, and compared against an exponentially weighted average of the player’s own previous weeks — so the model moves on surprise rather than output. That becomes a percentile within the position group, then adjusted for age, league strength, position and availability.

An estimated value is not a transfer fee. Full methodology.