Search players

Find a player by name, club or ticker

MIDDemo Premier LeaguePortugal34 years

Elias Ibarra

Rookwood · #15 · IB13

Report →

Estimated market value

€425k

Model range
€220k – €631k
Confidence
45%
Season change
−17.1%

Movement

Last matchweek
+2.7%
Last 4 matchweeks
−1.8%
Season to date
−17.1%

Reported in matchweeks, not days — football data arrives by fixture round.

Model estimate, uncalibrated. Values are model estimates on an uncalibrated scale. They are not predictions of a transfer fee and have not been validated against observed fees. Model 0.3.0-uncalibrated.

Valuation drivers

What moves this away from the €4.00m base value

  • Performance−€684k
  • Age−€2.03m
  • League€0
  • Position+€63k
  • Availability−€923k

Not in this model

  • ContractNo contract expiry data in the feed
  • Market comparablesNo observed transfer fees in the feed

Availability

Read any valuation against this first

Available minutes played15% · 326 of 2160

6 appearances, 3 starts, 18 matchweeks missed.

A player who is not on the pitch drifts down the index without his performance level falling with it, and availability is a direct discount on the valuation above. An unavailable player is not the same thing as a cheap one.

Scenarios

What the model would say under a different set of facts

  • As measured€425kbenchmark
  • Performance +10%€468k+€43k · +10.0%
  • Performance +20%€511k+€85k · +20.0%
  • Performance −10%€383k−€43k · −10.0%
  • One year older€304k−€122k · −28.6%
  • Fully available€759k+€333k · +78.4%
  • Moves to a stronger divisionAlready in the strongest division we rate

These are counterfactuals, not forecasts. Each row is the same model run with one input changed — it says nothing about whether that change is likely. The benchmark is this player’s measured estimate of €425k.

Player DNA

Percentile against MIDs in the Demo Premier League

  • Goal threat28
  • Chance creation31
  • Finishing46
  • Defending8
  • Availability7

Well-rounded midfielder without a standout axis in this data — no category clears the 46th percentile among positional peers. Availability is the headline risk: 15% of available minutes played.

Generated from the metrics above, not from scouting notes. Ball progression and pressing are absent because the feed carries no progressive passes, carries or pressures.

Valuation history

The performance index the valuation is built on, by matchweek

Elias Ibarra index by matchweek

Profile

Per-90 percentiles against MIDs

Percentiles as a table
MetricElias Ibarra
Key passes56th
Expected assists23rd
Expected goals23rd
Goals13th
Tackles11th
Interceptions25th

Per 90

Rate and percentile among MIDs with 270+ minutes

  • Goals0.00
  • Assists0.00
  • Shots1.9
  • Shots on target0.3
  • Key passes0.8
  • Expected goals0.02
  • Expected assists0.03
  • Tackles0.8
  • Interceptions0.8
  • Clearances0.8

Finishing

Goals against the quality of the chances they came from, running total

Elias Ibarra cumulative goals minus expected goals
−0.1−0.1−0.0−0.00.0Matchweek

Scoring 0.08 goals fewer than his chances were worth — the chances are being created.

Comparable players

Closest percentile profiles among the same position

Compare →
PlayerSimilarityValueAgeAlike on
Noah BrennanDeepdale Vale86%€1.85m30goals, assists
Hugo YilmazPendlebury79%€2.47m26goals, assists
Idris RasmussenStanmoor77%€525k28assists, expected assists
Felix ToureenDeepdale Vale76%€2.88m28goals, assists
Wilson GrimaldiGranthorpe74%€12.9m25assists, interceptions
Samir ZielinskiJarrowgate73%€556k20goals, assists

Match log

6 appearances this season

Match-by-match statistics, most recent first
MWDateOpponentMinGAShSoTxGxAKPTklIntClr
2423 Janat KelsfordL 1290001.00.00.030.052.01.01.00.0
1628 Novv NorthfleetD 0022001.00.00.000.010.00.00.00.0
1017 Octv BrackenfordW 1090002.01.00.010.010.01.02.02.0
83 Octv QuarrydaleL 0212000.00.00.000.000.00.00.00.0
726 Septv OakhurstD 2222001.00.00.010.020.00.00.00.0
329 Augv GranthorpeL 0190002.00.00.030.021.01.00.01.0

Data

Last fixture
23 Jan
Matchweeks covered
24
Model
0.3.0-uncalibrated

Comparable transfers and contract situation are not shown, because the feed carries no transfer fees and no contract expiry dates. See methodology for what the model can and cannot see.