Search players

Find a player by name, club or ticker

Player report

Noah Quintana

MID · Thorneside · Demo Premier League · 20 years · Netherlands

Valuation

Estimated value
€1.06m
Model range
€509k–€1.62m
Confidence
38%
Season change
−18.7%

Values are model estimates on an uncalibrated scale. They are not predictions of a transfer fee and have not been validated against observed fees. Model 0.3.0-uncalibrated.

Performance profile

Player DNA

  • Goal threat80
  • Chance creation95
  • Finishing88
  • Defending3
  • Availability6

Per 90, percentile ranked

  • Goals0.28
  • Assists0.28
  • Shots2.5
  • Shots on target0.3
  • Key passes1.4
  • Expected goals0.22
  • Expected assists0.20
  • Tackles0.6
  • Interceptions0.8
  • Clearances0.8

Elite chance creation midfielder (95th percentile), with strong finishing (88th). Defending is the clear gap at the 3th percentile. Availability is the headline risk: 15% of available minutes played.

Season

Appearances
6
Minutes
325
Goals / assists
1 / 1
Availability
15%

Key strengths

  • Chance creation is a clear strength95th percentile among MIDs in this division
  • Finishing is a clear strength88th percentile among MIDs in this division
  • Goal threat is a clear strength80th percentile among MIDs in this division
  • Elite volume of shots2.49 per 90, 99th percentile

Key risks and limitations

  • Defending is a clear weakness3th percentile among MIDs in this division
  • Availability is the headline risk15% of available minutes; 18 matchweeks missed
  • Small sample325 minutes across 6 appearances. Percentiles are published but thinly evidenced.
  • Low model confidence38% against a ceiling of 72%. The valuation range is correspondingly wide.

Valuation history

Noah Quintana index by matchweek

Comparable players

PlayerSimilarityValueAge
Emil HaugenNorthfleet84%€11.5m25
Diogo BrennanGranthorpe81%€12.2m32
Andre EkstromFallowfield77%€13.1m29
Hugo EkstromBrackenford74%€15.3m24
Bruno IbarraBrackenford74%€878k19

Comparable transfers

Not available. The feed carries no observed transfer fees and no contract expiry dates, so there is nothing to build a comparable-fee distribution from.

This section is left in rather than removed, because its absence is itself a finding: any fee inference in this report would be unsupported.

Data confidence

Model confidence
38%of 72% ceiling
Sample
325 min · 6 apps
Last fixture
23 Jan

Percentiles are taken against MIDs in the Demo Premier League with 270 or more minutes. The model holds no contract, injury, wage or transfer data, and no progressive passing, carrying or pressing metrics.

Methodology

Weekly output is weighted by position, discounted by minutes as a credibility multiplier, and compared against an exponentially weighted average of the player’s own previous weeks — so the model moves on surprise rather than output. That becomes a percentile within the position group, then adjusted for age, league strength, position and availability.

An estimated value is not a transfer fee. Full methodology.

Generated from data covering 24 matchweeks. Model 0.3.0-uncalibrated. Values are model estimates on an uncalibrated scale and are not transfer fees.