Search players

Find a player by name, club or ticker

MIDDemo Premier LeagueFrance34 years

Mateo Eriksen

Deepdale Vale · #16 · ERI1

Report →

Estimated market value

€107k

Model range
€48k – €166k
Confidence
32%
Season change
−11.8%

Movement

Last matchweek
−1.5%
Last 4 matchweeks
−4.4%
Season to date
−11.8%

Reported in matchweeks, not days — football data arrives by fixture round.

Model estimate, uncalibrated. Values are model estimates on an uncalibrated scale. They are not predictions of a transfer fee and have not been validated against observed fees. Model 0.3.0-uncalibrated.

Valuation drivers

What moves this away from the €4.00m base value

  • Performance−€1.94m
  • Age−€1.37m
  • League€0
  • Position+€42k
  • Availability−€624k

Not in this model

  • ContractNo contract expiry data in the feed
  • Market comparablesNo observed transfer fees in the feed

Availability

Read any valuation against this first

Available minutes played15% · 322 of 2160

6 appearances, 3 starts, 18 matchweeks missed.

A player who is not on the pitch drifts down the index without his performance level falling with it, and availability is a direct discount on the valuation above. An unavailable player is not the same thing as a cheap one.

Scenarios

What the model would say under a different set of facts

  • As measured€107kbenchmark
  • Performance +10%€117k+€11k · +10.0%
  • Performance +20%€128k+€21k · +20.0%
  • Performance −10%€96k−€11k · −10.0%
  • One year older€76k−€30k · −28.6%
  • Fully available€191k+€84k · +78.8%
  • Moves to a stronger divisionAlready in the strongest division we rate

These are counterfactuals, not forecasts. Each row is the same model run with one input changed — it says nothing about whether that change is likely. The benchmark is this player’s measured estimate of €107k.

Player DNA

Percentile against MIDs in the Demo Premier League

  • Goal threat14
  • Chance creation98
  • Finishing46
  • Defending20
  • Availability5

Elite chance creation midfielder (98th percentile). Goal threat is the clear gap at the 14th percentile. Availability is the headline risk: 15% of available minutes played.

Generated from the metrics above, not from scouting notes. Ball progression and pressing are absent because the feed carries no progressive passes, carries or pressures.

Valuation history

The performance index the valuation is built on, by matchweek

Mateo Eriksen index by matchweek

Profile

Per-90 percentiles against MIDs

Percentiles as a table
MetricMateo Eriksen
Key passes86th
Expected assists99th
Expected goals20th
Goals13th
Tackles4th
Interceptions62nd

Per 90

Rate and percentile among MIDs with 270+ minutes

  • Goals0.00
  • Assists0.56
  • Shots1.4
  • Shots on target0.3
  • Key passes1.1
  • Expected goals0.02
  • Expected assists0.39
  • Tackles0.6
  • Interceptions1.1
  • Clearances1.7

Finishing

Goals against the quality of the chances they came from, running total

Mateo Eriksen cumulative goals minus expected goals
−0.1−0.0−0.00.0Matchweek

Scoring 0.06 goals fewer than his chances were worth — the chances are being created.

Comparable players

Closest percentile profiles among the same position

Compare →
PlayerSimilarityValueAgeAlike on
Zeki DelgadoAshcombe88%€2.02m19goals, clearances
Goran SalvatoreRookwood84%€10.2m28interceptions, clearances
Lucas XimenesRookwood79%€3.65m34goals, shots on target
Caleb IbarraFallowfield78%€31.5m29shots, key passes
Bruno DelgadoIlkeston Park78%€1.53m25goals, key passes
Elias EriksenEastmarsh76%€27.3m26clearances, expected goals

Match log

6 appearances this season

Match-by-match statistics, most recent first
MWDateOpponentMinGAShSoTxGxAKPTklIntClr
212 Janat StanmoorD 0029000.00.00.000.020.00.00.01.0
137 Novat CalderbrookL 0290002.01.00.020.051.02.02.00.0
1231 Octat ThornesideL 0232001.00.00.000.020.00.00.01.0
1017 Octat PendleburyW 1014010.00.00.000.631.00.00.00.0
83 Octat LangmereL 0377001.00.00.010.020.00.00.02.0
329 Augv BrackenfordD 2280011.00.00.030.642.00.02.02.0

Data

Last fixture
2 Jan
Matchweeks covered
24
Model
0.3.0-uncalibrated

Comparable transfers and contract situation are not shown, because the feed carries no transfer fees and no contract expiry dates. See methodology for what the model can and cannot see.