Search players

Find a player by name, club or ticker

MIDDemo Premier LeagueScotland29 years

Dmitri Toureen

Hollinwell · #12 · TOU6

Report →

Estimated market value

€834k

Model range
€404k – €1.26m
Confidence
39%
Season change
−12.1%

Movement

Last matchweek
+0.3%
Last 4 matchweeks
+0.7%
Season to date
−12.1%

Reported in matchweeks, not days — football data arrives by fixture round.

Model estimate, uncalibrated. Values are model estimates on an uncalibrated scale. They are not predictions of a transfer fee and have not been validated against observed fees. Model 0.3.0-uncalibrated.

Valuation drivers

What moves this away from the €4.00m base value

  • Performance−€1.63m
  • Age−€401k
  • League€0
  • Position+€79k
  • Availability−€1.21m

Not in this model

  • ContractNo contract expiry data in the feed
  • Market comparablesNo observed transfer fees in the feed

Availability

Read any valuation against this first

Available minutes played14% · 293 of 2160

5 appearances, 3 starts, 19 matchweeks missed.

A player who is not on the pitch drifts down the index without his performance level falling with it, and availability is a direct discount on the valuation above. An unavailable player is not the same thing as a cheap one.

Scenarios

What the model would say under a different set of facts

  • As measured€834kbenchmark
  • Performance +10%€918k+€83k · +10.0%
  • Performance +20%€1.00m+€167k · +20.0%
  • Performance −10%€751k−€83k · −10.0%
  • One year older€712k−€122k · −14.6%
  • Fully available€1.52m+€684k · +82.0%
  • Moves to a stronger divisionAlready in the strongest division we rate

These are counterfactuals, not forecasts. Each row is the same model run with one input changed — it says nothing about whether that change is likely. The benchmark is this player’s measured estimate of €834k.

Player DNA

Percentile against MIDs in the Demo Premier League

  • Goal threat76
  • Chance creation82
  • Finishing72
  • Defending79
  • Availability2

Strong chance creation midfielder (82th percentile), with strong defending (79th). Availability is the headline risk: 14% of available minutes played.

Generated from the metrics above, not from scouting notes. Ball progression and pressing are absent because the feed carries no progressive passes, carries or pressures.

Valuation history

The performance index the valuation is built on, by matchweek

Dmitri Toureen index by matchweek

Profile

Per-90 percentiles against MIDs

Percentiles as a table
MetricDmitri Toureen
Key passes18th
Expected assists92nd
Expected goals86th
Goals90th
Tackles76th
Interceptions76th

Per 90

Rate and percentile among MIDs with 270+ minutes

  • Goals0.31
  • Assists0.31
  • Shots1.8
  • Shots on target0.3
  • Key passes0.6
  • Expected goals0.28
  • Expected assists0.23
  • Tackles1.5
  • Interceptions1.2
  • Clearances2.2

Finishing

Goals against the quality of the chances they came from, running total

Dmitri Toureen cumulative goals minus expected goals
0.0+0.1+0.1Matchweek

Scoring 0.10 goals more than his chances were worth. Finishing runs like this historically revert.

Comparable players

Closest percentile profiles among the same position

Compare →
PlayerSimilarityValueAgeAlike on
Samir NakamuraBrackenford80%€4.67m29shots on target, clearances
Jonas HalvorsenFallowfield76%€28.3m26expected goals, shots on target
Pedro YilmazIlkeston Park76%€36.2m22clearances, interceptions
Zeki NakamuraKelsford76%€5.88m34expected assists, key passes
Wilson ChevalierRookwood75%€941k23interceptions, clearances
Noah JansenStanmoor74%€11.7m25shots, interceptions

Match log

5 appearances this season

Match-by-match statistics, most recent first
MWDateOpponentMinGAShSoTxGxAKPTklIntClr
2423 Janat BrackenfordL 1376001.00.00.010.040.02.02.00.0
2316 Janat StanmoorL 0158001.00.00.020.030.01.01.02.0
212 Janat OakhurstL 0261001.00.00.000.030.02.00.02.0
1017 Octat LangmereL 128000.00.00.000.000.00.00.00.0
512 Septv BrackenfordW 5290113.01.00.870.642.00.01.03.0

Data

Last fixture
23 Jan
Matchweeks covered
24
Model
0.3.0-uncalibrated

Comparable transfers and contract situation are not shown, because the feed carries no transfer fees and no contract expiry dates. See methodology for what the model can and cannot see.